Virus Outbreak Spain Daily Life

If passed, Measure 108 would increase Oregon’s cigarette tax by $2 per pack — from $1.33 to $3.33. It would also increase the cap on cigar taxes to $1 per cigar and add a 65% tax on e-cigarettes and vaping products, which are not currently taxed.

SALEM — Two measures the Oregon Legislature placed on the Nov. 3 ballot for Oregonians to vote on include limiting campaign contributions and increasing tax on cigarettes, as well as creating a tax on electronic cigarettes.

Both have received widespread and bipartisan support, which proponents hope will help push the measures to victory.

A vote in favor of ballot Measure 108 would increase Oregon’s cigarette tax by $2 per pack — from $1.33 to $3.33 — increase the cap on cigar taxes to $1 per cigar, and add a 65% tax on e-cigarettes and vaping products, which are not currently taxed.

The funds from the tax increase would be used for public health programs, including smoking prevention and cessation programs. The projected new annual revenue is about $130 million.

Supporters of the bill include Oregon Gov. Kate Brown, state lawmakers and organizations, such as the American Heart Association, the American Lung Association, and the Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems.

Brown said not only does she believe the measure would save lives and help people quit smoking, but it will also “ensure Oregonians can continue to access the health care they need to thrive” due to the increased funds.

All Democrats in Oregon’s House and Senate, except for one, voted in favor of the tax.

“Ultimately, I’m tired of seeing my patients — too often the working poor who were targeted by big tobacco in their youth — die premature and painful deaths because of the impact of tobacco. This weighs on me every day,” said Rep. Rachel Prusak, D-West Linn, who is a nurse practitioner. “And it also ultimately weighs on the state — currently, the Oregon Health Plan spends roughly $374 million a year just treating tobacco-related illnesses.”

According to the American Cancer Society, in 2020 it is estimated that 1,750 Oregonians will die from lung or bronchus cancer. Cancer, in general, is the leading cause of death in Oregon.

Out of the 22 Republicans in the House, Rep. Cheri Helt and Rep. Greg Smith were the only two who voted in favor of the tax.

During a committee session about the then-bill, Smith said he supported it because the people who would receive public assistance for health care will likely end up paying for a portion of the tax themselves.

According to Oregon Secretary of State campaign finance records, the Yes for a Healthy Future/Oregonians for a Smoke Free Tomorrow political action committee has collected more than $13.1 million in campaign contributions.

The only political action committees that filed opposition to the measure with the Oregon Secretary of State’s Office was the Taxpayers Association of Oregon, whose leaders say the tax would negatively impact low-income consumers and small businesses selling the products.

Among states with the highest cigarette tax rate in 2019 were New York and Connecticut, which both tax $4.35 per pack.

As of 2019, more than a dozen states, including Oregon, levied a tax rate ranging from $1 to $1.98 per pack. If the measure were to pass, Oregon would sit with at least 10 other states, including Washington, whose tax rate for a pack of cigarettes is between $2 and $3.10.

Also on November’s ballot is Measure 107, which if voted in favor of would amend the Oregon Constitution and allow for state, counties and cities to place limitations on political contributions and expenditures, require disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures, and allow rules requiring campaigns to be transparent about who paid for political advertisements.

Currently, there is no limit in contributions to candidates or ballot measures. Other states without limits include Alabama, Nebraska and Utah.

In 1997, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that the state constitution’s section, specifically regarding freedom of speech, prevents the Legislature from limiting campaign finance activity.

The measure has received widespread and bipartisan support, including Brown, state senators and representatives.

“A constitutional amendment must make it clear to voters and the courts that campaign contributions may be regulated and that the greatest transparency in campaigns is permissible,” Brown said. “My goal is to see lasting constitutional authority to regulate campaign finance in Oregon and to see reasonable limits put in place.”

Kyle Markley, a Libertarian and frequent candidate for political office, filed his opposition to the measure saying it would weaken Oregon’s freedom of speech guarantees.

Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.